City Survivability Rankings for Chinese Restaurant
StreetSpring's 2026 analysis ranks the top cities for Chinese Restaurants across the US by Survivability Scores. See which cities offer the best chances for a Chinese Restaurant to succeed.
Quick Summary
- Survivability Score: the projected chance a business type lasts two or more years at a specific address
- The highest-ranked city for Chinese Restaurant is Charlotte: 83.1% at a good address, 73.3% at a typical address
- Dallas is left out of this ranking while a gap in its input data is repaired, and San Antonio is left out because it has too few scored locations to rank fairly
- 6 of 22 analyzed US metros average above 70% for Chinese Restaurant survivability at a typical address
- The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 76.3%
- National average chance of lasting two or more years for Chinese Restaurant: 67.4%
- Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 22 US metro areas · Full methodology →
Table of Contents
- Summary
- Top Cities for Chinese Restaurants
- Key Insights
- What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
- Related Resources
- How current is this ranking?
- Can a Chinese Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
- What tools can help me choose the right city for a Chinese Restaurant?
- Which US city has the best survivability for Chinese Restaurants?
Summary
According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Charlotte ranks as the #1 city for opening a Chinese Restaurant in the United States, with an 83.1% chance of lasting two or more years at a good address. Following close behind are Atlanta with 83.1%, and Orlando with 82.7%. The national picture for Chinese Restaurants shows 67.4% average survivability across 22 cities, with the gap between Charlotte and lower-ranked metros revealing significant geographic variation. Remember that a city's average score smooths over wide variation: your exact neighborhood could significantly outperform the city average. The best way to use these rankings is as a starting point: layer in your own market research and local knowledge before committing.
Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →
Best-to-worst Chinese Restaurant survivability within individual metros: Charlotte, Atlanta, Baltimore, Boston and New York City. Each box spans the middle of that metro's range; whiskers are its best and worst locations (2026).
All 22 Cities Ranked for Chinese Restaurants
Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 22 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Chinese Restaurants:
| # | Metro | Metro area | Chance of lasting two or more years at a good address |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlotte | Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC | 83.1% |
| 2 | Atlanta | Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA | 83.1% |
| 3 | Orlando | Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL | 82.7% |
| 4 | Denver | Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO | 82.7% |
| 5 | Houston | Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX | 82.7% |
| 6 | Minneapolis | Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI | 81.8% |
| 7 | St. Louis | St. Louis, MO-IL | 81.8% |
| 8 | Seattle | Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA | 81.8% |
| 9 | Washington DC | Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV | 81.8% |
| 10 | Los Angeles | Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA | 81.3% |
| 11 | Detroit | Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI | 80.8% |
| 12 | Baltimore | Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD | 80.8% |
| 13 | Miami | Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL | 80.4% |
| 14 | Philadelphia | Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD | 80.0% |
| 15 | San Diego | San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA | 80.0% |
| 16 | Phoenix | Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ | 80.0% |
| 17 | Chicago | Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN | 80.0% |
| 18 | San Francisco | San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA | 80.0% |
| 19 | Portland | Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA | 79.5% |
| 20 | Tampa Bay | Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL | 79.0% |
| 21 | Boston | Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH | 78.6% |
| 22 | New York City | New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ | 76.3% |
1. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC
- At a good address: 83.1%
- At a typical address: 73.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Charlotte →
2. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA
- At a good address: 83.1%
- At a typical address: 72.6%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Atlanta →
3. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 71.9%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Orlando →
4. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 71.4%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Denver →
5. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX
- At a good address: 82.7%
- At a typical address: 71.1%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Houston →
6. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI
- At a good address: 81.8%
- At a typical address: 70.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Minneapolis →
7. St. Louis Metro: St. Louis, MO-IL
- At a good address: 81.8%
- At a typical address: 69.7%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in St. Louis →
8. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA
- At a good address: 81.8%
- At a typical address: 69.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Seattle →
9. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV
- At a good address: 81.8%
- At a typical address: 66.5%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Washington DC →
10. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- At a good address: 81.3%
- At a typical address: 65.1%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Los Angeles →
11. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI
- At a good address: 80.8%
- At a typical address: 68.4%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Detroit →
12. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD
- At a good address: 80.8%
- At a typical address: 67.1%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Baltimore →
13. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL
- At a good address: 80.4%
- At a typical address: 64.6%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Miami →
14. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 66.4%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Philadelphia →
15. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 66.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in San Diego →
16. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 65.9%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Phoenix →
17. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 64.2%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Chicago →
18. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA
- At a good address: 80.0%
- At a typical address: 64.0%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in San Francisco →
19. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA
- At a good address: 79.5%
- At a typical address: 64.3%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Portland →
20. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL
- At a good address: 79.0%
- At a typical address: 64.9%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Tampa Bay →
21. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH
- At a good address: 78.6%
- At a typical address: 64.1%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in Boston →
22. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ
- At a good address: 76.3%
- At a typical address: 60.8%
- Best scored location: 84.0%
- Weakest scored location: 48.0%
- Explore Chinese Restaurant neighborhoods in New York City →
Key Insights
Moderate variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Charlotte at 83.1%) and the #22 city (New York City at 76.3%) is 6.80 percentage points. A gap of well under a point between Charlotte and Atlanta is small. Address-level differences inside a single metro run much wider for Chinese Restaurants.
National average: Across all 22 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Chinese Restaurant is 67.4%.
What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Chinese Restaurants:
- Strong survivability signals: Charlotte leads with a 73% average chance of lasting two or more years for Chinese Restaurants: significantly above the national average for this business category.
- Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Chinese Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
- Low market saturation: Top cities for Chinese Restaurants have fewer direct competitors per square mile than lower-ranked metros, leaving meaningful whitespace for well-positioned new entrants.
- Supply chain access: Cities at the top of this ranking benefit from mature supplier networks for this category, reducing operating costs and inventory lead times.
StreetSpring publishes AI-driven survivability forecasts for agents and entrepreneurs nationwide, with the method and the files behind every figure. We apply advanced machine learning to massive commercial real estate datasets to build accurate models. Our forecasting system combines proprietary data with machine learning models unavailable anywhere else.
Related Resources
City-specific guides: For detailed neighborhood-level analysis, explore our city guides:
- Survivability Rankings for Chinese Restaurant in Charlotte
- Business Survivability Rankings: Charlotte
- Survivability Rankings for Chinese Restaurant in Atlanta
- Business Survivability Rankings: Atlanta
- Survivability Rankings for Chinese Restaurant in Orlando
- Business Survivability Rankings: Orlando
- Survivability Rankings for Chinese Restaurant in Denver
- Survivability Rankings for Chinese Restaurant in Houston
- Business Survivability Rankings: Houston
National guides:
How current is this ranking?
Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates: particularly for Chinese Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.
Can a Chinese Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
Yes, our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Chinese Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Chinese Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align, even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.
What tools can help me choose the right city for a Chinese Restaurant?
StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Chinese Restaurants across all 22 metros we track. For this category specifically, the model reads competition density, the consumer spending index for Chinese Restaurants, and Census neighborhood characteristics such as the housing vacancy rate, and turns them into the projected chance that a Chinese Restaurant lasts two or more years at a given address. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.
Try the Survivability Score tool →
Which US city has the best survivability for Chinese Restaurants?
Charlotte ranks as the #1 city in the US for Chinese Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average 73% chance of lasting two or more years. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Charlotte, a Chinese Restaurant has approximately a 73% chance of still operating after two years, above the national average for this category. Atlanta ranks second, followed by Orlando. The full ranking reflects data across 22 major US metro areas: see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.
Last reviewed: October 2026 by Robert Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring
Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.
StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and walkability data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.
Methodology: Each metro's figures pool the scored locations in its published neighborhoods. Metros are ranked the way the national data file ranks them, on the chance of lasting two or more years at a good address; the typical-address figure is shown alongside. Coverage includes 22 major US metropolitan areas: Charlotte, Atlanta, Orlando, Denver, Houston, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Seattle, Washington DC, Los Angeles, Detroit, Baltimore, Miami, Philadelphia, San Diego, Phoenix, Chicago, San Francisco, Portland, Tampa Bay, Boston, New York City. StreetSpring scores 500+ business types: 153 base business types, most of them at 5 price points, which is 569 type-and-price combinations you can choose in the tool.