City Survivability Rankings for Pan-Asian Restaurant

Quick Summary

• Survivability Score: the projected chance a business type lasts two or more years at a specific address
• The highest-ranked city for Pan-Asian Restaurant is Charlotte: 83.1% at a good address, 73.2% at a typical address
• Dallas is left out of this ranking while a gap in its input data is repaired, and San Antonio is left out because it has too few scored locations to rank fairly
• 6 of 22 analyzed US metros average above 70% for Pan-Asian Restaurant survivability at a typical address
• The lowest-ranked city is New York City at 76.3%
• National average chance of lasting two or more years for Pan-Asian Restaurant: 67.2%
• Data reflects 2026 StreetSpring survivability analysis across 22 US metro areas · Full methodology →

---

Table of Contents

• Summary
• Top Cities for Pan-Asian Restaurants
• Key Insights
• What Makes These Cities Stand Out?
• Related Resources
• How current is this ranking?
• Can a Pan-Asian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?
• What tools can help me choose the right city for a Pan-Asian Restaurant?
• Which US city has the best survivability for Pan-Asian Restaurants?

---

Summary

According to StreetSpring's 2026 nationwide analysis, Charlotte ranks as the #1 city for opening a Pan-Asian Restaurant in the United States, with an 83.1% chance of lasting two or more years at a good address. Following close behind are Atlanta with 83.1%, and Orlando with 82.7%. StreetSpring's 22-city analysis places the national average for Pan-Asian Restaurants at 67.2%, a baseline that Charlotte comfortably exceeds. Keep in mind that results depend heavily on the exact location; strong sites often exist within cities that seem less favorable overall. These rankings reflect data through early 2026: check StreetSpring for the latest figures before any location decision.

Survivability ranges reflect best and worst storefront conditions within each city. See our full methodology →

Best-to-worst Pan-Asian Restaurant survivability within individual metros: Charlotte, Atlanta, Miami, Boston and New York City. Each box spans the middle of that metro's range; whiskers are its best and worst locations (2026).

---

All 22 Cities Ranked for Pan-Asian Restaurants

Based on StreetSpring's analysis of 22 major metropolitan areas, these cities offer the strongest prospects for Pan-Asian Restaurants:

1. Charlotte Metro: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC

• At a good address: 83.1%
• At a typical address: 73.2%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

2. Atlanta Metro: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA

• At a good address: 83.1%
• At a typical address: 72.5%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

3. Orlando Metro: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL

• At a good address: 82.7%
• At a typical address: 71.8%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

4. Denver Metro: Denver-Aurora-Centennial, CO

• At a good address: 82.7%
• At a typical address: 71.3%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

5. Houston Metro: Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX

• At a good address: 82.7%
• At a typical address: 71.1%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

6. Minneapolis Metro: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI

• At a good address: 81.8%
• At a typical address: 70.2%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

7. St. Louis Metro: St. Louis, MO-IL

• At a good address: 81.8%
• At a typical address: 69.6%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

8. Seattle Metro: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA

• At a good address: 81.8%
• At a typical address: 69.1%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

9. Washington DC Metro: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV

• At a good address: 81.3%
• At a typical address: 66.4%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

10. Detroit Metro: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI

• At a good address: 80.8%
• At a typical address: 68.3%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

11. Baltimore Metro: Baltimore-Columbia-Towson, MD

• At a good address: 80.4%
• At a typical address: 67.0%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

12. Miami Metro: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL

• At a good address: 80.4%
• At a typical address: 64.5%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

13. Los Angeles Metro: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA

• At a good address: 80.4%
• At a typical address: 64.4%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

14. Philadelphia Metro: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD

• At a good address: 80.0%
• At a typical address: 66.3%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

15. San Diego Metro: San Diego-Chula Vista-Carlsbad, CA

• At a good address: 80.0%
• At a typical address: 66.1%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

16. Phoenix Metro: Phoenix-Mesa-Chandler, AZ

• At a good address: 80.0%
• At a typical address: 65.8%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

17. Chicago Metro: Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN

• At a good address: 80.0%
• At a typical address: 64.0%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

18. San Francisco Metro: San Francisco-Oakland-Fremont, CA

• At a good address: 80.0%
• At a typical address: 63.9%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

19. Portland Metro: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA

• At a good address: 79.5%
• At a typical address: 64.3%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

20. Tampa Bay Metro: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL

• At a good address: 79.0%
• At a typical address: 64.9%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

21. Boston Metro: Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH

• At a good address: 78.6%
• At a typical address: 63.9%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

22. New York City Metro: New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ

• At a good address: 76.3%
• At a typical address: 60.8%
• Best scored location: 84.0%
• Weakest scored location: 48.0%

---

Key Insights

Moderate variation between cities: The difference between the #1 city (Charlotte at 83.1%) and the #22 city (New York City at 76.3%) is 6.80 percentage points. Less than a percentage point separates Charlotte from Atlanta. For Pan-Asian Restaurants, that is small next to the spread between the best and worst addresses in either city.

National average: Across all 22 analyzed cities, the average survivability for a Pan-Asian Restaurant is 67.2%.

---

What Makes These Cities Stand Out?

The top-ranked cities share several characteristics that favor Pan-Asian Restaurants:

• Strong survivability signals: Charlotte leads with a 73% average chance of lasting two or more years for Pan-Asian Restaurants: significantly above the national average for this business category.
• Competition density: The top cities show favorable competitor-to-opportunity ratios for Pan-Asian Restaurants, meaning lower saturation and higher odds of capturing an underserved customer base.
• Consumer demand signals: StreetSpring's data captures competitor review velocity, spending patterns, and demographic fit, all pointing toward sustained demand for Pan-Asian Restaurants in these markets.
• Economic conditions: The rankings for Pan-Asian Restaurants account for Census neighborhood characteristics, including median household income and the housing vacancy rate, alongside competition and consumer spending.

StreetSpring uses AI to predict business survivability across U.S. neighborhoods, for real estate professionals and entrepreneurs nationwide. Our forecasting engine processes data from over 24 metro areas covering 180+ million consumers. StreetSpring uses custom-built, proprietary algorithms to produce these predictions.

---

Related Resources

City-specific guides: For detailed neighborhood-level analysis, explore our city guides:

• Business Survivability Rankings: Charlotte
• Business Survivability Rankings: Atlanta
• Business Survivability Rankings: Orlando
• Business Survivability Rankings: Houston

National guides:

• Neighborhood Survivability Rankings: Charlotte

---

How current is this ranking?

Rankings are updated quarterly. The current data reflects StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with the next full dataset refresh scheduled for Q3 2026. As market conditions shift across major metros, individual city scores can move meaningfully between updates: particularly for Pan-Asian Restaurants, where local competition density and consumer spending patterns respond quickly to new entrants and neighborhood change. For the most current score at any specific address, use StreetSpring's live survivability tool rather than the static ranking above.

---

Can a Pan-Asian Restaurant succeed in cities not ranked in the top 10?

Yes, our top 10 ranking reflects cities with the strongest average conditions, but lower-ranked metros can still contain exceptional individual neighborhoods. Many operators successfully open Pan-Asian Restaurants in cities that don't appear in our top 10. Pan-Asian Restaurants in particular can find strong performance in secondary markets where the right demographic concentration, household income, and limited direct competition within walking distance align, even outside our highest-ranked cities. StreetSpring's neighborhood-level data surfaces these pockets of opportunity in every city we analyze, regardless of where the city as a whole ranks nationally.

---

What tools can help me choose the right city for a Pan-Asian Restaurant?

StreetSpring's Survivability Score tool provides address-level predictions for Pan-Asian Restaurants across all 22 metros we track. For this category specifically, the model reads competition density, the consumer spending index for Pan-Asian Restaurants, and Census neighborhood characteristics such as the housing vacancy rate, and turns them into the projected chance that a Pan-Asian Restaurant lasts two or more years at a given address. You can check any specific address before signing a lease and compare multiple neighborhoods side by side to identify the highest-survivability site within your target city.

Try the Survivability Score tool →

---

Which US city has the best survivability for Pan-Asian Restaurants?

Charlotte ranks as the #1 city in the US for Pan-Asian Restaurants survivability in StreetSpring's 2026 analysis, with an average 73% chance of lasting two or more years. This means that across well-selected neighborhoods in Charlotte, a Pan-Asian Restaurant has approximately a 73% chance of still operating after two years, above the national average for this category. Atlanta ranks second, followed by Orlando. The full ranking reflects data across 22 major US metro areas: see the complete list above for all scores and neighborhood-level links.

Last reviewed: October 2026 by Robert Koons, Founder & CEO, StreetSpring

---

Technical note: Aggregated national survivability rankings across all 24 metros are available in machine-readable format for research and integration purposes.

View national technical data

StreetSpring recalculates survivability using the latest competitive, demographic, and walkability data, so the live score may differ from the static ranges shown here.

Methodology: Each metro's figures pool the scored locations in its published neighborhoods. Metros are ranked the way the national data file ranks them, on the chance of lasting two or more years at a good address; the typical-address figure is shown alongside. Coverage includes 22 major US metropolitan areas: Charlotte, Atlanta, Orlando, Denver, Houston, Minneapolis, St. Louis, Seattle, Washington DC, Detroit, Baltimore, Miami, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, San Diego, Phoenix, Chicago, San Francisco, Portland, Tampa Bay, Boston, New York City. StreetSpring scores 500+ business types: 153 base business types, most of them at 5 price points, which is 569 type-and-price combinations you can choose in the tool.